[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEA6p_DRZA4aHW-Rxb7kJnwhPAy9HqDzY1nQgFGjCwNeVmTfJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:26:46 -0700
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] ipv6: fix route cache dump
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> After the commit 2b760fcf5cfb ("ipv6: hook up exception table to
> store dst cache"), entries in the routing cache are not shown by:
>
> ip route show cache
>
> because the per route exception table containing such routes is not
> traversed by rt6_dump_route().
> Fix it by explicitly dumping all routes present into the
> rt6i_exception_bucket.
>
> Fixes: 2b760fcf5cfb ("ipv6: hook up exception table to store dst cache")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 01a103c23a6c..5bb53dbd4fd3 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -4190,10 +4190,14 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net,
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> }
>
> +/* this is called under the RCU lock */
> int rt6_dump_route(struct rt6_info *rt, void *p_arg)
> {
> struct rt6_rtnl_dump_arg *arg = (struct rt6_rtnl_dump_arg *) p_arg;
> + struct rt6_exception_bucket *bucket;
> + struct rt6_exception *rt6_ex;
> struct net *net = arg->net;
> + int err, port_id, seq, i;
>
> if (rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry)
> return 0;
> @@ -4209,10 +4213,28 @@ int rt6_dump_route(struct rt6_info *rt, void *p_arg)
> }
> }
>
> - return rt6_fill_node(net,
> - arg->skb, rt, NULL, NULL, 0, RTM_NEWROUTE,
> - NETLINK_CB(arg->cb->skb).portid, arg->cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
> - NLM_F_MULTI);
> + /* dump execeptions table, if available */
> + port_id = NETLINK_CB(arg->cb->skb).portid;
> + seq = arg->cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
> + bucket = rcu_dereference(rt->rt6i_exception_bucket);
> + if (!bucket)
> + goto no_exceptions;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < FIB6_EXCEPTION_BUCKET_SIZE; i++) {
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(rt6_ex, &bucket->chain, hlist) {
> + err = rt6_fill_node(net, arg->skb, rt6_ex->rt6i, NULL,
> + NULL, 0, RTM_NEWROUTE, port_id, seq,
> + NLM_F_MULTI);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + bucket++;
> + }
> +
> +no_exceptions:
> + return rt6_fill_node(net, arg->skb, rt, NULL, NULL, 0, RTM_NEWROUTE,
> + port_id, seq, NLM_F_MULTI);
> }
>
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for doing this.
But I think your patch does not take care of the case where there are
a lot of cached routes in the exception table and 1 skb is just not
enough to dump the main route + all cached routes in the exception
table.
In this case, your patch will keep dumping the same main route.
I think some logic needs to be incorporated into the fib6_walk() so
that it can also remember the last dumped cached route if necessary in
the exception table and start from there for the next dump.
I do have a patch for that and that patch tries to keep a linked list
of all cached routes from the exception table in the walker struct and
remove any routes that are already dumped.
It is a bit complicated and might not be the best solution. And as
IPv4 already does not support dumping cached routes, I did not send
that out in the previous patch series.
> static int inet6_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> --
> 2.13.6
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists