netdev - [PATCH] net: l2tp: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171017224253.GA5877@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:42:53 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: l2tp: mark expected switch fall-through

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case I replaced the "NOBREAK" comment with
a "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).

 net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c
index 7135f46..f517942 100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int l2tp_nl_tunnel_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 seq, int fla
 		if (nla_put_u16(skb, L2TP_ATTR_UDP_SPORT, ntohs(inet->inet_sport)) ||
 		    nla_put_u16(skb, L2TP_ATTR_UDP_DPORT, ntohs(inet->inet_dport)))
 			goto nla_put_failure;
-		/* NOBREAK */
+		/* fall through  */
 	case L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_IP:
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
 		if (np) {
-- 
2.7.4