[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171018.141944.210190324694064262.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:19:44 +0100 (WEST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: fix tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() after
rbtree introduction
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:38:35 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> I tried to hard avoiding a call to rb_first() (via tcp_rtx_queue_head)
> in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue(). But this was probably too bold.
>
> Quoting Yuchung :
>
> We might miss re-arming the RTO if tp->retransmit_skb_hint is not NULL.
> This can happen when RACK marks the first packet lost again and resets
> tp->retransmit_skb_hint for example (tcp_rack_mark_skb_lost())
>
> Fixes: 75c119afe14f ("tcp: implement rb-tree based retransmit queue")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists