netdev - Re: Kernel 4.13.0-rc4-next-20170811 - IP Routing / Forwarding performance vs Core/RSS number / HT on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1508363646.31614.145.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:54:06 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.13.0-rc4-next-20170811 - IP Routing / Forwarding
 performance vs Core/RSS number / HT on

On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 23:49 +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:

> How far it is from applying this to the kernel ?
> 
> So far im using this on all my servers from about 3 months now without 
> problems

It is a hack, and does not support properly bonding/team.

( If the real_dev->privflags IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE bit changes,
 we want to update all the vlans at the same time )

We need something more sophisticated, and I had no time to spend on
this topic recently.