[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd59ccc3-2af4-6842-8d2f-169229a61470@itcare.pl>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:58:56 +0200
From: Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.parissis@...il.com>,
"Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio" <akp@...aesio.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"alexander.h.duyck@...el.com" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.12+ memory leak on router with i40e NICs
W dniu 2017-10-19 o 00:50, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>
>
> W dniu 2017-10-19 o 00:20, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>
>>
>> W dniu 2017-10-18 o 17:44, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>
>>>
>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 16:08, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 13:52, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 13:05, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 12:59, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 12:51, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 12:20, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 11:48, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 02:44, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-17 o 01:56, Alexander Duyck pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Paweł Staszewski
>>>>>>>>>>>> <pstaszewski@...are.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-16 o 18:26, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2017-10-16 o 13:20, Pavlos Parissis pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/10/2017 02:58 πμ, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pawel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To clarify is that Dave Miller's tree or Linus's that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are talking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about? If it is Dave's tree how long ago was it you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pulled it since I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think the fix was just pushed by Jeff Kirsher a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days ago.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The issue should be fixed in the following commit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c?id=2b9478ffc550f17c6cd8c69057234e91150f5972
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when it is going to be available on net-next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and linux-stable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repos?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pavlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will make some tests today night with "net" git tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where this patch is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting from 0:00 CET
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upgraded and looks like problem is not solved with that patch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently running system with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still about 0.5GB of memory is leaking somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also can confirm that the latest kernel where memory is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not leaking (with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use i40e driver intel 710 cards) is 4.11.12
>>>>>>>>>>>>> With kernel 4.11.12 - after hour no change in memory usage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> also checked that with ixgbe instead of i40e with same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> net.git kernel there
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no memleak - after hour same memory usage - so for 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is i40e
>>>>>>>>>>>>> driver problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So how long was the run to get the .5GB of memory leaking?
>>>>>>>>>>> 1 hour
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also is there any chance of you being able to bisect to
>>>>>>>>>>>> determine
>>>>>>>>>>>> where the memory leak was introduced since as you pointed
>>>>>>>>>>>> out it
>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't exist in 4.11.12 so odds are it was introduced
>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>> between 4.11 and the latest kernel release.
>>>>>>>>>>> Can be hard cause currently need to back to 4.11.12 - this
>>>>>>>>>>> is production host/router
>>>>>>>>>>> Will try to find some free/test router for tests/bicects
>>>>>>>>>>> with i40e driver (intel 710 cards)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also forgoto to add errors for i40e when driver initialize:
>>>>>>>>>> [ 15.760569] i40e 0000:02:00.1: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>> [ 16.365587] i40e 0000:03:00.3: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>> [ 16.367686] i40e 0000:02:00.2: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>> [ 16.368816] i40e 0000:03:00.0: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>> [ 16.369877] i40e 0000:03:00.2: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>> [ 16.370941] i40e 0000:02:00.3: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>> [ 16.372005] i40e 0000:02:00.0: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>> [ 16.373029] i40e 0000:03:00.1: Error I40E_AQ_RC_ENOSPC
>>>>>>>>>> adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> some params that are set for this nic's
>>>>>>>>>> ip link set up dev $i
>>>>>>>>>> ethtool -A $i autoneg off rx off tx off
>>>>>>>>>> ethtool -G $i rx 1024 tx 2048
>>>>>>>>>> ip link set $i txqueuelen 1000
>>>>>>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off
>>>>>>>>>> rx-usecs 512 tx-usecs 128
>>>>>>>>>> ethtool -L $i combined 6
>>>>>>>>>> #ethtool -N $i rx-flow-hash udp4 sdfn
>>>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i ntuple on
>>>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro off
>>>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso off
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also after TSO/GRO on there is memory usage change - and
>>>>>>>>> leaking faster
>>>>>>>>> Below image from memory usage before change with TSO/GRO OFF
>>>>>>>>> and after enabling TSO/GRO
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/dTqBY6
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Pawel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With settings like this:
>>>>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs
>>>>>>>> 512 tx-usecs 128
>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro on
>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Server is leaking about 4-6MB per each 10 seconds
>>>>>>>> MEMLEAK:
>>>>>>>> 5 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 6 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 4 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 4 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other settings TSO/GRO off
>>>>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs
>>>>>>>> 512 tx-usecs 128
>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro off
>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso off
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Same leak about 5MB per 10 seconds
>>>>>>>> MEMLEAK:
>>>>>>>> 5 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 5 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 5 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other settings rx-usecs change from 512 to 1024:
>>>>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs
>>>>>>>> 1024 tx-usecs 128
>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro off
>>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso off
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MEMLEAK:
>>>>>>>> 4 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 3 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 4 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>> 4 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So memleak have something to do with rx-usecs (less interrupts
>>>>>>>> but bigger latency for traffic)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But also enabling TSO/GRO making leak about 1MB bigger for each
>>>>>>>> 10 seconds
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far best config is:
>>>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs
>>>>>>> 64 tx-usecs 512
>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro off
>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MEMLEAK - about 2MB/10secs
>>>>>>> 2 MB/10sec
>>>>>>> 2 MB/10sec
>>>>>>> 2 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With - rx-usecs set to 256 (about 7-9MB/10secs memleak)
>>>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs
>>>>>>> 256 tx-usecs 512
>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro off
>>>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MEMLEAK:
>>>>>>> 7 MB/10sec
>>>>>>> 7 MB/10sec
>>>>>>> 8 MB/10sec
>>>>>>> 9 MB/10sec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And even less memleak with rx-usecs set to 32
>>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>>> do
>>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs 32
>>>>>> tx-usecs 512
>>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro off
>>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> done
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MEMLEAK - about 0-2MB for each 10 seconds
>>>>>> 0 MB/10sec
>>>>>> 1 MB/10sec
>>>>>> 0 MB/10sec
>>>>>> 2 MB/10sec
>>>>>> 1 MB/10sec
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So best settings - to have as less leak as possible for now
>>>>> (rx-usecs set to 16):
>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>> do
>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs 16
>>>>> tx-usecs 768
>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro on
>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso on
>>>>>
>>>>> done
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> MEMLEAK: (0-1MB/10seconds)
>>>>> 0 MB/10sec
>>>>> 0 MB/10sec
>>>>> 0 MB/10sec
>>>>> 1 MB/10sec
>>>>> 1 MB/10sec
>>>>> -1 MB/10sec
>>>>> 1 MB/10sec
>>>>> 1 MB/10sec
>>>>> 0 MB/10sec
>>>>>
>>>>> (there are some memory recycles - so this is good :) )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Compared to(rx-usecs 512):
>>>>>
>>>>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1
>>>>> enp3s0f2 enp3s0f3'
>>>>> for i in $ifc
>>>>> do
>>>>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs 512
>>>>> tx-usecs 128
>>>>> ethtool -K $i gro on
>>>>> ethtool -K $i tso on
>>>>>
>>>>> done
>>>>>
>>>>> Server is leaking about 4-6MB per each 10 seconds
>>>>> MEMLEAK:
>>>>> 5 MB/10sec
>>>>> 6 MB/10sec
>>>>> 4 MB/10sec
>>>>> 4 MB/10sec
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And graph where all changes for rx-usecs was done over some time:
>>>> https://ibb.co/nrRfbR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Cant eliminate the problem with settings - memleak is bigger or less
>>> visible with rx-usecs set to low values - but then have 100% cpu
>>> load - cant have rx-usecs set to 16
>>>
>>> Cant find also other host with same cards or that are using i40e
>>> driver for tests with bisecting
>>> So will just replace to mellanox :)
>>>
>>>
>> Also after fresh reboot with i40e
>> startup settings:
>> ifc='enp2s0f0 enp2s0f1 enp2s0f2 enp2s0f3 enp3s0f0 enp3s0f1 enp3s0f2
>> enp3s0f3'
>> for i in $ifc
>> do
>> ip link set up dev $i
>> ethtool -A $i autoneg off rx off tx off
>> ethtool -G $i rx 2048 tx 2048
>> ip link set $i txqueuelen 1000
>> #ethtool -C $i rx-usecs 256
>> ethtool -C $i adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs 17
>> tx-usecs 125
>> ethtool -L $i combined 6
>> #ethtool -N $i rx-flow-hash udp4 sdfn
>> #ethtool -K $i ntuple on
>> #ethtool -K $i gro off
>> #ethtool -K $i tso off
>> done
>>
>>
>> After issuing:
>>
>> ethtool -K enp2s0f0 gro on tso on
>>
>> dmesg shows
>> [35764.338259] i40e 0000:02:00.0: PF reset failed, -15
>>
>>
>> and no traffic on the card :)
>>
>>
> Also checked now
> bigger rx ring
> ethtool -G $i rx 2048 tx 2048
>
>
> Bigger memleag :)
>
>
>
ok need to change cards now to ixgbe .... no reply no help for i40e so ....
maybee someone else with i40e will gather more data i have only this
host soo far - will try to install this cards to other hosts after
change but alll this movement will takes about 2 maybee 3 months -
nobody from my team want to but now cards that supports i40e cause of
this bug soo this is hard now to debug - i need to change also all cards
now >10G to mellanox that have no such bug ... sorry :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists