[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78776143-0442-f1ce-745c-8371f20124e4@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:18:20 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Rohit Seth <rohit@...ntonium.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] strparser: Generalize strparser
On 10/19/2017 12:51 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 16:22 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> Generalize strparser from more than just being used in conjunction
>>> with read_sock. strparser will also be used in the send path with
>>> zero proxy. The primary change is to create strp_process function
>>> that performs the critical processing on skbs. The documentation
>>> is also updated to reflect the new uses.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/networking/strparser.txt | 207 +++++++++++++++-------
>>> include/net/strparser.h | 119 +++++++------
>>> net/kcm/kcmproc.c | 34 ++--
>>> net/kcm/kcmsock.c | 38 ++--
>>> net/strparser/strparser.c | 313
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>> 5 files changed, 424 insertions(+), 287 deletions(-)
>>
>> Just found this gem :
>>
>> static void strp_msg_timeout(unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> struct strparser *strp = (struct strparser *)arg;
>>
>> /* Message assembly timed out */
>> STRP_STATS_INCR(strp->stats.msg_timeouts);
>> strp->cb.lock(strp);
>> strp->cb.abort_parser(strp, ETIMEDOUT);
>> strp->cb.unlock(strp);
>> }
>>
>> static void strp_sock_lock(struct strparser *strp)
>> {
>> lock_sock(strp->sk);
>> }
>>
>> static void strp_sock_unlock(struct strparser *strp)
>> {
>> release_sock(strp->sk);
>> }
>>
>>
>> A timer runs from BH, and from this interrupt context it is absolutely
>> illegal to call lock_sock() ( and release_sock() )
>>
>> Please fix, thanks !
>>
>
> Nice catch! I'll fix it.
>
Can the lock/release be removed and the strp stopped bit can use atomics?
It looks like sk_error_report can be called without sock lock.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists