netdev - Re: [PATCH 18/27] bpf: Restrict kernel image access functions when the kernel is locked down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171020155748.kzrvg6565oxh6gmb@linux-rasp2>
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2017 23:57:48 +0800
From:   jlee@...e.com
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@...ula.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jforbes@...hat.com, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Gary Lin <GLin@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/27] bpf: Restrict kernel image access functions when
 the kernel is locked down

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:08:48AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Joey,
> 
> Should I just lock down sys_bpf() entirely for now?  We can always free it up
> somewhat later.
> 
> David

OK~~ Please just remove my patch until we find out a way to
verify bpf code or protect sensitive data in memory.

I think that we don't need to lock down sys_bpf() now because
we didn't lock down other interfaces for reading arbitrary
address like /dev/mem and /dev/kmem.

Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee