[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1710201551200.4174@t440>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:53:03 +1100 (AEDT)
From: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
To: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@...nternet.com>
cc: selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...l-moore.com, vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, eparis@...isplace.org, marcelo.leitner@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] security: Add support for SCTP security hooks
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Richard Haines wrote:
> The SCTP security hooks are explained in:
> Documentation/security/LSM-sctp.txt
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@...nternet.com>
> ---
> Documentation/security/LSM-sctp.txt | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 37 +++++++
> include/linux/security.h | 27 +++++
> security/security.c | 23 ++++
> 4 files changed, 299 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/security/LSM-sctp.txt
This looks ok from an LSM API pov, but note that I'm not an expert on
SCTP. It would be good to see more review from networking folk.
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
--
James Morris
<james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists