netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] tools: bpftool: show that `opcodes` or `file FILE` should be exclusive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:56:49 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:     oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] tools: bpftool: show that `opcodes` or `file
 FILE` should be exclusive

On 10/20/2017 12:46 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> From: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
>
> For the `bpftool prog dump { jited | xlated } ...` command, adding
> `opcodes` keyword (to request opcodes to be printed) will have no effect
> if `file FILE` (to write binary output to FILE) is provided.
>
> The manual page and the help message to be displayed in the terminal
> should reflect that, and indicate that these options should be mutually
> exclusive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>