lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:11:10 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Koichiro Den <den@...ipeden.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, ncardwell@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh before retransmits on TSQ
 handler

On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 09:49 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Here is the test I cooked.
> 
> Note that it actually passes just fine, do I am wondering if your patch
> is needed after all..
> 

Oh this is because tcp_mstamp_refresh() is called from tcp_write_xmit()
and tcp_write_xmit() is directly called from tcp_tsq_handler()

So it looks your patch has no observable effect.

(Even with usec TS as we use here at Google, it has no effect since TCP
stack does not consider RTT samples being valid if skb was ever
retransmitted)



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ