[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_=-swK=xYC2rf2O5vN03+hz0-EHuJo694-hDzCdt8pjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:54:54 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] poor TX performance on new GbE driver
On 22 October 2017 at 20:38, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 20:14 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am working on upstreaming a network driver for a Socionext SoC, and
>> I am having some trouble figuring out why my TX performance is
>> horrible when booting a Debian Stretch rootfs, while booting a Ubuntu
>> 17.04 rootfs works absolutely fine. Note that this is using the exact
>> same kernel image, booted off the network.
>>
>> Under Ubuntu, I get the following iperf results from the box to my AMD
>> Seattle based devbox with a 1 Gbit switch in between. (The NIC in
>> question is also 1 Gbit)
>>
>>
>> $ sudo iperf -c dogfood.local -r
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Server listening on TCP port 5001
>> TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Client connecting to dogfood.local, TCP port 5001
>> TCP window size: 748 KByte (default)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> [ 5] local 192.168.1.112 port 51666 connected with 192.168.1.106 port 5001
>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
>> [ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.07 GBytes 920 Mbits/sec
>> [ 4] local 192.168.1.112 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.106 port 33048
>> [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 940 Mbits/sec
>>
>> Booting the *exact* same kernel into a Debian based rootfs results in
>> the following numbers
>> $ sudo iperf -c dogfood.local -r
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Server listening on TCP port 5001
>> TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Client connecting to dogfood.local, TCP port 5001
>> TCP window size: 85.0 KByte (default)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> [ 5] local 192.168.1.112 port 40132 connected with 192.168.1.106 port 5001
>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
>> [ 5] 0.0-10.1 sec 4.12 MBytes 3.43 Mbits/sec
>> [ 4] local 192.168.1.112 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.106 port 33068
>> [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec
>>
>> The ifconfig stats look perfectly fine to me (TX errors 0 dropped 0
>> overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0). During the TX test, the CPUs are
>> almost completely idle. (This system has 24 cores, but not
>> particularly powerful ones.)
>>
>> This test is based on v4.14-rc4, but v4.13 gives the same results.
>>
>> Could anyone please shed a light on this? What tuning parameters
>> and/or stats should I be looking at? I am a seasoned kernel developer
>> but a newbie when it comes to networking, so hopefully I just need a
>> nudge to go looking in the right place.
>
>
> This description smells a problem with TX completions being deferred.
>
> TX interrupts being lost or deferred too much.
>
Right. Do you have any if there are any userland-accessible tunables
that may affect this? I'm still rather stumped that the issue only
appears when running the Debian Stretch rootfs ...
Thanks,
Ard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists