[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171023181731.7977-2-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:17:30 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: legacy: don't unmask port bitmaps
The legacy code does not unmask the cpu_port_mask and dsa_port_mask as
stated. But this is done on the error path and those masks won't be used
after that. So instead of fixing the bit operation, simply remove it.
Fixes: 83c0afaec7b7 ("net: dsa: Add new binding implementation")
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
---
net/dsa/legacy.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/legacy.c b/net/dsa/legacy.c
index b6c88fd33d4f..93c1c43bcc58 100644
--- a/net/dsa/legacy.c
+++ b/net/dsa/legacy.c
@@ -272,10 +272,6 @@ static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
if (!(dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port)))
continue;
dsa_cpu_dsa_destroy(&ds->ports[port]);
-
- /* Clearing a bit which is not set does no harm */
- ds->cpu_port_mask |= ~(1 << port);
- ds->dsa_port_mask |= ~(1 << port);
}
if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read)
--
2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists