lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508733063.30291.72.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:31:03 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Koichiro Den <den@...ipeden.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, ncardwell@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh before retransmits on TSQ
 handler

On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 13:28 +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:

> Indeed, meaning that tcp_clean_rtx_queue implementation never takes.
> But for me it seems that there is some possibility RACK algorithm will take it.

As long as tp->tcp_mstamp is monotonically increasing (and it is ;) ),
RACK will behave properly.

I am not sure we need to discuss this forever frankly ;)
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ