[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171023220304.2268-14-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:03:02 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, Chris Mi <chrism@...lanox.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: [Patch net 13/15] net_sched: add rtnl assertion to tcf_exts_destroy()
After previous patches, it is now safe to claim that
tcf_exts_destroy() is always called with RTNL lock.
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
---
net/sched/cls_api.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 0b2219adf520..c48482942995 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -879,6 +879,7 @@ void tcf_exts_destroy(struct tcf_exts *exts)
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
LIST_HEAD(actions);
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
tcf_exts_to_list(exts, &actions);
tcf_action_destroy(&actions, TCA_ACT_UNBIND);
kfree(exts->actions);
--
2.13.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists