netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171023.021813.1166611788274727571.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2017 02:18:13 +0100 (WEST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     garsilva@...eddedor.com
Cc:     ralf@...ux-mips.org, wharms@....de, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add_node

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:08:40 -0500

> Code refactoring in order to make it easier to read and maintain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>

Gustavo, always when reposting a new version of a patch that is part of
a series you must _always_ repost the entire patch series.

Also, a proper patch series must begine with a "[PATCH 0/2] ..."
header posting explaining at a high level what the patch series
is doing, how it is doing it, and why it is doing it that way.

Thank you.