[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171024224419.5f85ea71@elisabeth>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 22:44:19 +0200
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/6] rtnetlink: a bunch of fixes for userspace
notifications in changing dev properties
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:13:40 +0800
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> Whenever any property of a link, address, route, etc. changes by whatever way,
> kernel should notify the programs that listen for such events in userspace.
>
> The patchet "rtnetlink: Cleanup user notifications for netdev events" tried to
> fix a redundant notifications issue, but it also introduced a side effect.
>
> After that, user notifications could only be sent when changing dev properties
> via netlink api. As it removed some events process in rtnetlink_event where
> the notifications was sent to users.
>
> It resulted in no notification generated when dev properties are changed via
> other ways, like ioctl, sysfs, etc. It may cause some user programs doesn't
> work as expected because of the missing notifications.
>
> This patchset will fix it by bringing some of these netdev events back and
> also fix the old redundant notifications issue with a proper way.
>
> Xin Long (6):
> rtnetlink: bring NETDEV_CHANGEMTU event process back in
> rtnetlink_event
> rtnetlink: bring NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN event process back in
> rtnetlink_event
> rtnetlink: bring NETDEV_POST_TYPE_CHANGE event process back in
> rtnetlink_event
> rtnetlink: bring NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event process back in
> rtnetlink_event
> rtnetlink: check DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY correctly in do_setlink
> rtnetlink: do not set notification for tx_queue_len in do_setlink
I guess this should be considered for -stable (back to 4.12), as it
fixes quite a few critical issues in notification behaviours userspace
might rely on.
--
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists