[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171025.230311.1944266209591105385.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 23:03:11 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/12] net: Make generic dst->child usage more explicit.
Only IPSEC (xfrm) routes have a dst->child which is non-NULL.
xfrm routes are identified by dst->xfrm being non-NULL.
Codify this explicitly in dst_destroy().
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
net/core/dst.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dst.c b/net/core/dst.c
index 662a2d4a3d19..6a3c21b8fc8d 100644
--- a/net/core/dst.c
+++ b/net/core/dst.c
@@ -116,12 +116,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dst_alloc);
struct dst_entry *dst_destroy(struct dst_entry * dst)
{
- struct dst_entry *child;
+ struct dst_entry *child = NULL;
smp_rmb();
- child = dst->child;
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
+ if (dst->xfrm)
+ child = dst->child;
+#endif
if (!(dst->flags & DST_NOCOUNT))
dst_entries_add(dst->ops, -1);
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists