[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3760392e2813ec13d37430143f83571d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:35:06 -0600
From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pablo@...filter.org, laforge@...monks.org,
aschultz@...p.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rohit@...ntonium.net,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 05/12] gtp: Change to use gro_cells
> @@ -611,6 +615,8 @@ static const struct net_device_ops gtp_netdev_ops =
> {
>
> static void gtp_link_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> + struct gtp_dev *gtp = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> dev->netdev_ops = >p_netdev_ops;
> dev->needs_free_netdev = true;
>
> @@ -630,6 +636,8 @@ static void gtp_link_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> sizeof(struct iphdr) +
> sizeof(struct udphdr) +
> sizeof(struct gtp0_header);
> +
> + gro_cells_init(>p->gro_cells, dev);
> }
>
Hi Tom
This needs a check in case the initialization failed and moved to
ndo_init().
Eric spotted a similar bug in rmnet and vxlan.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists