netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bindings: net: stmmac: Add documentation for TSN parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171026215629.GB8489@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:56:29 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bindings: net: stmmac: Add documentation
 for TSN parameters

> About my patches, what I think would be better now would be to
> drop the configuration by DT and integrate the remaining
> configuration, letting the EST parameters be populated by SoC
> specific wrappers.

Hi Jose

The problem with SoC specific wrappers is that you are going to have
to remove them once the real interface is defined. Anybody who uses
your SoC specific wrappers is going to have to re-write their code,
when it all gets ripped out.

You generally don't add device SoC specific wrappers. Imagine if
everybody did that. Lots of different ways of doing the same thing.
My suggesting is to keep your patches out for the moment, waiting for
generic support to be added.

     Andrew