[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171026.091938.335307812019705410.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:19:38 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/12] net: Make generic dst->child usage more
explicit.
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:55:17 -0700
> You might squash this patch with the following one ;)
Indeed.
The whole bit of changing dst->child is a bit tricky because of
the generic layer need to access it just for the dst destroy
case.
I'll think a bit more about how to transform this cleanly, so
thanks for the feedback.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists