[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171026070311.GS3323@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:03:11 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] xfrm: Move child route linkage into xfrm_dst.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:03:59PM +0900, David Miller wrote:
>
> XFRM bundle child chains look like this:
>
> xdst1 --> xdst2 --> xdst3 --> path_dst
>
> All of xdstN are xfrm_dst objects and xdst->u.dst.xfrm is non-NULL.
> The final child pointer in the chain, here called 'path_dst', is some
> other kind of route such as an ipv4 or ipv6 one.
>
> The xfrm output path pops routes, one at a time, via the child
> pointer, until we hit one which has a dst->xfrm pointer which
> is NULL.
>
> We can easily preserve the above mechanisms with child sitting
> only in the xfrm_dst structure. All children in the chain
> before we break out of the xfrm_output() loop have dst->xfrm
> non-NULL and are therefore xfrm_dst objects.
>
> Since we break out of the loop when we find dst->xfrm NULL, we
> will not try to dereference 'dst' as if it were an xfrm_dst.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
This one seems to be somewhat screwed up, it does not apply.
Looks like your mail contains two patches, both have some overlap.
You have:
> ---
> include/net/dst.h | 12 +-----------
> include/net/xfrm.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
> net/core/dst.c | 2 +-
> net/core/pktgen.c | 12 ++++++------
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
And:
> ---
> include/net/dst.h | 3 +--
> include/net/xfrm.h | 13 +++++++++----
> net/core/dst.c | 9 ++++++---
> net/core/pktgen.c | 12 ++++++------
> net/netfilter/xt_policy.c | 3 ++-
> net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists