netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 00/20] net: sched: convert cls ndo_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171028101724.1e4e1374@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:17:24 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>, idosch@...lanox.com,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
        "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/20] net: sched: convert cls ndo_setup_tc
 offload calls to per-block callbacks

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:43:51 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 09:53:21AM CEST, kubakici@...pl wrote:
> >On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:20:31 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:  
> >> Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:52:00AM CEST, kubakici@...pl wrote:  
> >> >On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:27:30 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:    
> >> >> Yes, it is the same.    
> >> >
> >> >FWIW I also see what Amritha and Alex are describing here, for cls_bpf
> >> >there are no DESTROYs coming on rmmod or qdisc del.  There is a DESTROY
> >> >if I manually remove the filter (or if an ADD with skip_sw fails).    
> >> 
> >> Is this different to the original behaviour? Just for cls_bpf?  
> >
> >For cls_bpf the callbacks used to be 100% symmetrical, i.e. destroy
> >would always be guaranteed if add succeeded (regardless of state of
> >skip_* flags).  
> 
> Hmm. It still should be symmetrical. Looking at following path:
> cls_bpf_destroy->
>    __cls_bpf_delete->
>       cls_bpf_stop_offload->
>          cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, prog, TC_CLSBPF_DESTROY)
> 
> I don't see how any tp could be missed. Could you please check this
> callpath is utilized during your action (rmmod or qdisc del)?

The same path seems to be utilized but the unbind comes before the
filters are destroyed.