lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:40:25 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        Eyal Reizer <eyalr@...com>, Iain Hunter <drhunter95@...il.com>,
        James Minor <james.minor@...com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Maxim Altshul <maxim.altshul@...com>,
        Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] wlcore: Use common error handling code in
 wlcore_nvs_cb()

>> @@ -6551,6 +6549,11 @@ static void wlcore_nvs_cb(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>>  out:
>>         release_firmware(fw);
>>         complete_all(&wl->nvs_loading_complete);
>> +       return;
>> +
>> +power_off:
> 
> Name this "out_power_off" to match the other labels.

Do you expect a second approach for this patch series then?


>> +       wl1271_power_off(wl);
>> +       goto out_free_nvs;
> 
> Why not put this in front of the out_free_nvs label?

It seems that I can not really follow this suggestion at the moment.


> It looks weird here.

Which detail do you not like?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ