[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75de8a99-9d4f-03b8-a2f7-10d1b89b937f@sigmadesigns.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:44:16 +0100
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
<opendmb@...il.com>, <slash.tmp@...e.fr>, <david.daney@...ium.com>,
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/4] net: phy: PHY_HALTED, the return of the state
On 26/10/2017 01:21, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> This patch series tries to address the shortcomings of the previously and then
> quickly reverted commit 7ad813f208533cebfcc32d3d7474dc1677d1b09a ("net: phy:
> Correctly process PHY_HALTED in phy_stop_machine()")
>
> This time, the empire returns and strikes back with a few additional changes:
>
> - catch phy_disconnect() calls without prior phy_stop() and warn when that
> happens since that means a driver is not behaving properly. This is AFAIR
> the case in which David Daney ran into
>
> - what David also was running into is that when the PHY state machine was
> already in PHY_HALTED, its synchronous call in phy_disconnect() would make
> us re-schedule ourselves at the end. This is unnecessary, and we now take
> care of that
>
> - finally, Geert experienced bus errors on smsc911x for a number of reasons,
> but the primary one is that the driver does not do any management of the
> PHY state machine during suspend/resume. The last patch corrects that, and
> also suggests that the driver should be fixed to properly support Wake-on-LAN
> configuration to possibly suspend the PHY.
>
> David, Marc and Geert, I would appreciate if you could give this patch series
> a spin on your respective HW and confirm that the desired functionality is
> achieved.
Hello Florian,
Thanks for taking a fresh look at this viper's nest :-)
I applied the patch series on top of v4.14-rc7, and my board had the expected
Ethernet functionality.
The "link down" notification does appear on the console shortly after issuing
the "ip link set eth0 down" command.
A one-minute iperf3 default run shows no particular issue.
I've had something in the back of my mind for a few weeks now: it seems like most
drivers try to disable the Ethernet hardware, and reclaim the packet descriptors,
when the ndo_stop() callback is invoked.
What happens when the HW does not support such a feature?
Case in point, the HW engineer responsible for integrating the Aurora IP told me
that it does not support disabling RX DMA. His exact words are:
> Once a descriptor chain is set by the software, the hardware will use
> them whenever a packet is received. There is no way to reclaim the
> buffers unless you reset the hardware.
So basically, the nb8800_dma_stop() function is a big hack, trying to disable
RX DMA, despite this being unsupported.
If I understand correctly, this is what we should do instead:
* When ndo_stop() is invoked, turn the Ethernet block off.
* Wait for the dust to settle.
* At this point, it should be safe to free the packet descriptors.
* As Mans pointed out, we would need to save the state of the HW block,
since turning it off discards context.
Regards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists