[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031141520.GC7663@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:15:20 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, davem@...emloft.net,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: fix regression introduced by xdst pcpu cache
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> It is a regression; the correct SA was being used prior to the xdst
> pcpu cache commit.
I don't doubt that at all. I would like to understand why the flow
cache did not have this problem.
> easily run on a Fedora VM,
> git clone https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite/
> sudo dnf install perl-Test perl-Test-Harness perl-Test-Simple selinux-policy-devel gcc libselinux-devel net-tools netlabel_tools iptables
> sudo make -C policy load
> cd tests/inet_socket
> while sudo ./test; do : ; done
Thanks, I'll have a look.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists