[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031103739.03cd28ee@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:37:39 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Cc: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tools: bpftool: optionally show filenames
of pinned objects
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:54:20 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > @@ -265,6 +266,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > { "help", no_argument, NULL, 'h' },
> > { "pretty", no_argument, NULL, 'p' },
> > { "version", no_argument, NULL, 'V' },
> > + { "pinned", no_argument, NULL, 'l' },
>
> “l” is not especially easy to remember for “pinned”, but I don't see a
> good alternative, so fine by me (uppercase “P” may not make things any
> better I suppose).
Since -p is taken maybe something to do with bpffs instead of pinned?
--bpffs | -b or -f?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists