netdev - Re: [Patch net] net_sched: remove tcf_block_put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:40:43 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] net_sched: remove tcf_block_put_deferred()

Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 07:10:09PM CET, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>In commit 7aa0045dadb6 ("net_sched: introduce a workqueue for RCU callbacks of tc filter")
>I defer tcf_chain_flush() to a workqueue, this causes a use-after-free
>because qdisc is already destroyed after we queue this work.
>
>The tcf_block_put_deferred() is no longer necessary after we get RTNL
>for each tc filter destroy work, no others could jump in at this point.
>Same for tcf_chain_hold(), we are fully serialized now.
>
>This also reduces one indirection therefore makes the code more
>readable. Note this brings back a rcu_barrier(), however comparing
>to the code prior to commit 7aa0045dadb6 we still reduced one
>rcu_barrier(). For net-next, we can consider to refcnt tcf block to
>avoid it.
>
>Fixes: 7aa0045dadb6 ("net_sched: introduce a workqueue for RCU callbacks of tc filter")
>Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
>Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>---
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 37 ++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>index 231181c602ed..b2d310745487 100644
>--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ static void tcf_block_put_final(struct work_struct *work)
> 	struct tcf_block *block = container_of(work, struct tcf_block, work);
> 	struct tcf_chain *chain, *tmp;
> 
>-	/* At this point, all the chains should have refcnt == 1. */
> 	rtnl_lock();
>+	/* Only chain 0 should be still here. */
> 	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, tmp, &block->chain_list, list)
> 		tcf_chain_put(chain);
> 	rtnl_unlock();
>@@ -289,23 +289,17 @@ static void tcf_block_put_final(struct work_struct *work)
> }
> 
> /* XXX: Standalone actions are not allowed to jump to any chain, and bound
>- * actions should be all removed after flushing. However, filters are destroyed
>- * in RCU callbacks, we have to hold the chains first, otherwise we would
>- * always race with RCU callbacks on this list without proper locking.
>+ * actions should be all removed after flushing. However, filters are now
>+ * destroyed in tc filter workqueue with RTNL lock, they can not race here.
>  */
>-static void tcf_block_put_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
>+void tcf_block_put(struct tcf_block *block)
> {
>-	struct tcf_block *block = container_of(work, struct tcf_block, work);
>-	struct tcf_chain *chain;
>+	struct tcf_chain *chain, *tmp;
> 
>-	rtnl_lock();
>-	/* Hold a refcnt for all chains, except 0, in case they are gone. */
>-	list_for_each_entry(chain, &block->chain_list, list)
>-		if (chain->index)
>-			tcf_chain_hold(chain);
>+	if (!block)
>+		return;
> 
>-	/* No race on the list, because no chain could be destroyed. */
>-	list_for_each_entry(chain, &block->chain_list, list)
>+	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, tmp, &block->chain_list, list)
> 		tcf_chain_flush(chain);

The reason for the hold above was to avoid use after free in this loop.
Consider following example:

chain1
  1 filter with action goto_chain 2
chain2
  empty

Now in your list_for_each_entry_safe loop, chain1 is flushed, action is
removed and chain is put:
tcf_action_goto_chain_fini->tcf_chain_put(2)

Given the fact chain2 is empty, this put would lead to tcf_chain_destroy(2)

Then in another iteration of list_for_each_entry_safe you are using
already freed chain.

Am I missing something that prevents this?