[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2187e555-2c4e-ef55-1c3a-17f5af54d762@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:19:51 -0400
From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@...com>
To: <sagi@...mberg.me>
CC: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <leonro@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: mlx5 broken affinity
Hi,
The below patch seems to have broken PCI IRQ affinity assignments for mlx5.
Prior to this patch I could echo a value to /proc/irq/<x>/smp_affinity
and it would get assigned. With this patch applied I get -EIO
The actual affinity assignments seem to have changed too, but I assume
this is a result of the generic allocation?
With this applied I get:
[root@...tbox /proc/irq]# cat 50/smp_affinity
000000,00000010
[root@...tbox /proc/irq]# cat 100/smp_affinity
100000,00000000
Without I get:
[root@...tbox /proc/irq]# cat 50/smp_affinity
000000,00000200
[root@...tbox /proc/irq]# cat 100/smp_affinity
000100,00000000
I am not wildly familiar with the affinity assignment code. Is there
something obvious I am missing here?
Cheers,
Jes
commit a435393acafbf0ecff4deb3e3cb554b34f0d0664
Author: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Date: Thu Jul 13 11:09:40 2017 +0300
mlx5: move affinity hints assignments to generic code
generic api takes care of spreading affinity similar to
what mlx5 open coded (and even handles better asymmetric
configurations). Ask the generic API to spread affinity
for us, and feed him pre_vectors that do not participate
in affinity settings (which is an improvement to what we
had before).
The affinity assignments should match what mlx5 tried to
do earlier but now we do not set affinity to async, cmd
and pages dedicated vectors.
Also, remove mlx5e_get_cpu and introduce mlx5e_get_node
(used for allocation purposes) and mlx5_get_vector_affinity
(for indirection table construction) as they provide the needed
information. Luckily, we have generic helpers to get cpumask
and node given a irq vector. mlx5_get_vector_affinity will
be used by mlx5_ib in a subsequent patch.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists