lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABGNecw9thLB4XOFdWRghj6E_uMrFroVko-Up6hodS75hmb4sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:27:49 -0700
From:   Joe Smith <codesoldier1@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: SKB Reference Question

How strictly are references on the SKB enforced. For example,
tcp_transmit_skb() clones the SKB and adds a TCP header. Can I assume
that in case of re-transmission the header added will be there and can
be reused instead of creating a new one from scratch. Some fields like
time stamp would need to be updated but they should be unmodified.

Regards,

-- 
JS

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ