netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] refactor code and mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171101123415.Horde.loz1BKI5e4PY4wt8KJqogy7@gator4166.hostgator.com>
Date:   Wed, 01 Nov 2017 12:34:15 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, wharms@....de,
        hal@...net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] refactor code and mark expected switch
 fall-throughs


Quoting David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:50:57 -0500
>
>> The aim of this patchset is firstly to refactor code in nr_route.c  
>> in order to make it
>> easier to read and maintain and, secondly, to mark some expected  
>> switch fall-throughs
>> in preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> I have to mention that I did not implement any unit test.
>> If someone has any suggestions on how I could test this piece of code
>> it'd be greatly appreciated.
>
> Series applied, thank you.

Glad to help.

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva