lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171102151801.24500-1-kraigatgoog@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu,  2 Nov 2017 11:18:01 -0400
From:   Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] bpf: fix verifier NULL pointer dereference

From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>

do_check() can fail early without allocating env->cur_state under
memory pressure.  Syzkaller found the stack below on the linux-next
tree because of this.

  kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
  kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
  general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
  Dumping ftrace buffer:
     (ftrace buffer empty)
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 1 PID: 27062 Comm: syz-executor5 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc7+ #106
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  task: ffff8801c2c74700 task.stack: ffff8801c3e28000
  RIP: 0010:free_verifier_state kernel/bpf/verifier.c:347 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:bpf_check+0xcf4/0x19c0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4533
  RSP: 0018:ffff8801c3e2f5c8 EFLAGS: 00010202
  RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 00000000fffffff4 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000070 RSI: ffffffff817d5aa9 RDI: 0000000000000380
  RBP: ffff8801c3e2f668 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 1ffff100387c5d9f
  R10: 00000000218c4e80 R11: ffffffff85b34380 R12: ffff8801c4dc6a28
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8801c4dc6a00 R15: ffff8801c4dc6a20
  FS:  00007f311079b700(0000) GS:ffff8801db300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00000000004d4a24 CR3: 00000001cbcd0000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
   bpf_prog_load+0xcbb/0x18e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1166
   SYSC_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1690 [inline]
   SyS_bpf+0xae9/0x4620 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1652
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe
  RIP: 0033:0x452869
  RSP: 002b:00007f311079abe8 EFLAGS: 00000212 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000758020 RCX: 0000000000452869
  RDX: 0000000000000030 RSI: 0000000020168000 RDI: 0000000000000005
  RBP: 00007f311079aa20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000212 R12: 00000000004b7550
  R13: 00007f311079ab58 R14: 00000000004b7560 R15: 0000000000000000
  Code: df 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 e6 0b 00 00 4d 8b 6e 20 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 49 8d bd 80 03 00 00 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 b6 0b 00 00 49 8b bd 80 03 00 00 e8 d6 0c 26
  RIP: free_verifier_state kernel/bpf/verifier.c:347 [inline] RSP: ffff8801c3e2f5c8
  RIP: bpf_check+0xcf4/0x19c0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4533 RSP: ffff8801c3e2f5c8
  ---[ end trace c8d37f339dc64004 ]---

Fixes: 638f5b90d460 ("bpf: reduce verifier memory consumption")
Fixes: 1969db47f8d0 ("bpf: fix verifier memory leaks")
Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

v2:
  Forgot second spot for the same bug in bpf_analyzer (from Alexei).

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 530b68550fd2..624aee966ab5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4530,8 +4530,10 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
 	env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
 
 	ret = do_check(env);
-	free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true);
-	env->cur_state = NULL;
+	if (env->cur_state) {
+		free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true);
+		env->cur_state = NULL;
+	}
 
 skip_full_check:
 	while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL));
@@ -4637,8 +4639,10 @@ int bpf_analyzer(struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *ops,
 	env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
 
 	ret = do_check(env);
-	free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true);
-	env->cur_state = NULL;
+	if (env->cur_state) {
+		free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true);
+		env->cur_state = NULL;
+	}
 
 skip_full_check:
 	while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL));
-- 
2.15.0.403.gc27cc4dac6-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ