[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171102200412.16757-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:04:12 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][net-next] net: sched: cls_bpf: use bitwise & rather than logical && on gen_flags
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently gen_flags is being operated on by a logical && operator rather
than a bitwise & operator. This looks incorrect as these should be bit
flag operations. Fix this.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460305 ("Logical vs. bitwise operator")
Fixes: 3f7889c4c79b ("net: sched: cls_bpf: call block callbacks for offload)
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
index 5f701c8670a2..bc3edde1b9d7 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int cls_bpf_offload_cmd(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_bpf_prog *prog,
}
}
- if (addorrep && skip_sw && !(prog->gen_flags && TCA_CLS_FLAGS_IN_HW))
+ if (addorrep && skip_sw && !(prog->gen_flags & TCA_CLS_FLAGS_IN_HW))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists