netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] nfp: bpf: rename ALU_OP_NEG and support BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171102.164748.1852340900831595296.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 02 Nov 2017 16:47:48 +0900 (KST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] nfp: bpf: rename ALU_OP_NEG and support
 BPF_NEG

From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Date: Wed,  1 Nov 2017 10:38:23 -0700

> Jiong says:
> 
>   Compilers are starting to use BPF_NEG, for example LLVM. However, NFP
> does not support JITing it. This patch set adds this. Unit test is added
> as well.
> 
>   Meanwhile, the current NFP_ALU_NEG is actually doing bitwise NOT (one's
> complement) operation, so the name is misleading. This patch set corrects
> this.

Series applied, thanks.