[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171103.211949.776819501386263401.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:19:49 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: echaudro@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] arp: Ignore packets with an all zero sender
mac address
From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:39:04 +0100
> Looking for any mentioning of an all-zero MAC address being invalid,
> the only reference I could find was in the original first Xerox Wire
> Specification. The IEEE specifications do not mention this at all, and
> according to it, the all-zero address is a valid MA-L address assigned
> to Xerox.
>
> Looking at the packet more, it might be an attempt to do an unARP (RFC
> 1868) but forgot to implement to set the Hardware Address Length to
> zero.
>
> I'm sure adding an arptables entry can be used to solve this instead,
> in case the offending device cannot be fixed.
>
> Please ignore this patch...
Ok, thanks for looking more deeply into this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists