lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1509744679.2849.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:31:19 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix tcp_mtu_probe() vs highest_sack

On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 19:22 +0100, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Thanks for the fix.
> 
> However, tcp_fastretrans_alert() warning case still remains open even with 
> this patch. Do I understand correctly that these are 2 different issues?
> 
> Currently, I use latest 4.13 stable kernel + this patch and still get:
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 736 at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2826 tcp_fastretrans_alert
> +0x7c8/


My patch only fixed the panics that you guys reported.

The warning issue in fastretrans is a separate problem,
we are still working on it, but at least the effects are not
catastrophic.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ