[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171104.223822.848425746136000220.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 22:38:22 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: horms@...ge.net.au
Cc: ja@....bg, hustcat@...il.com, willemb@...gle.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, johannes.berg@...el.com, dcaratti@...hat.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, fw@...len.de,
soheil@...gle.com, dwindsor@...il.com, elena.reshetova@...el.com,
tom@...ntonium.net, Jason@...c4.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, chouryzhou@...il.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter/ipvs: clear ipvs_property flag when SKB net
namespace changed
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 15:46:50 +0100
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 01:33:09PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Ye Yin wrote:
>>
>> > When run ipvs in two different network namespace at the same host, and one
>> > ipvs transport network traffic to the other network namespace ipvs.
>> > 'ipvs_property' flag will make the second ipvs take no effect. So we should
>> > clear 'ipvs_property' when SKB network namespace changed.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ye Yin <hustcat@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhou <chouryzhou@...il.com>
>>
>> Patch looks good to me. ipvs_property was added long ago
>> but skb_scrub_packet() is more recent (3.11), so:
>>
>> Fixes: 621e84d6f373 ("dev: introduce skb_scrub_packet()")
>> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
>>
>> I guess, DaveM can apply it directly as a bugfix
>> to the net tree.
>
> Sounds like a good plan to me, Dave?
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Sure, applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists