[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJR0GREnPXyPJnbZTAbO6RjVYbeGu9Wn76YS4XOGRpeSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 08:15:31 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] ipv6: addrconf: add per netns perturbation in inet6_addr_hash()
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Eric Dumazet,
>>>
>>> The patch 3f27fb23219e: "ipv6: addrconf: add per netns perturbation
>>> in inet6_addr_hash()" from Oct 23, 2017, leads to the following
>>> static checker warning:
>>>
>>> net/core/pktgen.c:2169 pktgen_setup_inject()
>>> error: buffer overflow 'pkt_dev->cur_in6_saddr.in6_u.u6_addr8' 16 <= 255
>>>
>>> net/core/pktgen.c
>>> 2157 if (pkt_dev->flags & F_IPV6) {
>>> 2158 int i, set = 0, err = 1;
>>> 2159 struct inet6_dev *idev;
>>> 2160
>>> 2161 if (pkt_dev->min_pkt_size == 0) {
>>> 2162 pkt_dev->min_pkt_size = 14 + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)
>>> 2163 + sizeof(struct udphdr)
>>> 2164 + sizeof(struct pktgen_hdr)
>>> 2165 + pkt_dev->pkt_overhead;
>>> 2166 }
>>> 2167
>>> 2168 for (i = 0; i < IN6_ADDR_HSIZE; i++)
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> My guess is that this is the wrong test here, but I don't know for sure.
>>>
>>> 2169 if (pkt_dev->cur_in6_saddr.s6_addr[i]) {
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^
>>> This used to work but now that IN6_ADDR_HSIZE is 256 instead of 16 we're
>>> reading beyond the end of the array.
>>>
>>> 2170 set = 1;
>>> 2171 break;
>>> 2172 }
>>> 2173
>>> 2174 if (!set) {
>>> 2175
>>> 2176 /*
>>> 2177 * Use linklevel address if unconfigured.
>>> 2178 *
>>> 2179 * use ipv6_get_lladdr if/when it's get exported
>>> 2180 */
>>> 2181
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> dan carpenter
>>
>> pktgen is obviously wrong.
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>
> I am travelling to Seoul for netconf/netdev, please send this patch in
> an official way.
>
> Thanks !
>
> diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c
> index 6e1e10ff433a5f4097d1d4b33848ab13d4e005c6..e3fa53a07d34b3e5f6b438e08b440f520b3cd6d4
> 100644
> --- a/net/core/pktgen.c
> +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c
> @@ -2165,7 +2165,7 @@ static void pktgen_setup_inject(struct
> pktgen_dev *pkt_dev)
> + pkt_dev->pkt_overhead;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < IN6_ADDR_HSIZE; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct in6_addr); i++)
> if (pkt_dev->cur_in6_saddr.s6_addr[i]) {
> set = 1;
> break;
Also I would move
include/net/addrconf.h:62:#define IN6_ADDR_HSIZE_SHIFT 8
include/net/addrconf.h:63:#define IN6_ADDR_HSIZE (1 <<
IN6_ADDR_HSIZE_SHIFT)
to net/ipv6/addrconf.c to avoid future misuses like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists