[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171106134608.GA6081@salvia>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:46:08 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] netfilter/ipvs: Use %pS printk format for direct
addresses
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:52:24AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:28:00PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > The debug and error printk functions in ipvs uses wrongly the %pF instead of
> > the %pS printk format specifier for printing symbols for the address returned
> > by _builtin_return_address(0). Fix it for the ia64, ppc64 and parisc64
> > architectures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
> > Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
>
> Sorry for the delay in processing this.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
>
> Pablo, could you take this through the nf-next tree directly?
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists