[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+y9GTPPjL2xTasun_e9M7jdE98DCGHWFtGF=JTPzLYOyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:05:59 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: allan <allan@...x.com.tw>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Dean Jenkins <Dean_Jenkins@...tor.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: asix: fill null-ptr-deref in asix_suspend
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 06.11.2017, 13:30 +0100 schrieb Andrey Konovalov:
>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > 2. Will a device work after that? The appropriate fix may be to wait
>> > until the device is properly initialized.
>>
>> This shouldn't affect real devices as far as I understand. The crash
>> can be caused by a crafted malicious device.
>
> Hi!
>
> Hm. That seems strange as driver_priv is kmalloced. Do you
> still have a descriptor that causes this?
> Shouldn't we rather reject such a broken device?
I do have a way to reproduce this.
As far as I understand, for this particular device ax88172_bind() is
called, which doesn't assign anything to dev->driver_priv, so that's
why it is NULL in suspend() and resume().
>
> Regards
> Oliver
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists