[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda5encW6gcpcKh_0Je17Z=fkGwixLur1iGJ+Dc1+kHRsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:25:30 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Antti Seppälä <a.seppala@...il.com>,
Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>,
Colin Leitner <colin.leitner@...glemail.com>,
Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] RFC: net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> I'm wondering if this should be modelled as a normal MDIO bus? Put the
> driver as drivers/net/mdio-realtek.c?
I looked into it but couldn't find a good fit.
The MDIO bus makes much more sense since more than one vendor
is using it so it's not a one-off. This Realtek is a RTK-specific thing plus
I don't think they are doing it anymore.
It's very confusing since they are using the MDIO electrical specification
and signal names but a totally different custom SMI wire protocol on top.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists