[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a99822f-693e-6490-e320-187996e0cc74@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:10:07 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: naresh.kamboju@...aro.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: use modprobe on
target device
On 11/07/2017 09:35 AM, naresh.kamboju@...aro.org wrote:
> From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Odd to see this From: line in the patch. Could you take a look
and see where this is coming from? Your gitconfig perhaps.
I have to fix this up when I apply the patch which I would like
to avoid.
>
> On ARM and ARM64 devices kernel source tree is not available so
> insmod "$SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" is not working.
>
> On these target devices the test_bpf.ko is installed under
> /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/lib/
> so use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf.ko module and
> insert for testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> index 2e5a1049e2f2..4757ca7d163c 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> @@ -14,6 +14,16 @@ test_run()
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> rc=1
> fi
> + else
> + # Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
> + if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
> + echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
> + elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
> + echo "test_bpf: ok"
> + else
> + echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
> + rc=1
> + fi
> fi
> rmmod test_bpf 2> /dev/null
> dmesg | grep FAIL
>
Okay now I am with you on the changes you are making in Patch v3 1/2 and
this one.
Please collapse these two patches into one or fix the SRC_TREE problem first
and then fix the missing module case.
I would like to get an Ack from net-dev folks before getting these in.
Alexei and Daniel! Please review and let me know if you good with this
change.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists