[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1510083131-3600-1-git-send-email-girish.moodalbail@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:32:11 -0800
From: Girish Moodalbail <girish.moodalbail@...cle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: [PATCH net] net: fix incorrect comment with regard to VLAN packet handling
The commit bcc6d4790361 ("net: vlan: make non-hw-accel rx path similar
to hw-accel") unified accel and non-accel path for VLAN RX. With that
fix we do not register any packet_type handler for VLANs anymore, so fix
the incorrect comment.
Signed-off-by: Girish Moodalbail <girish.moodalbail@...cle.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 2eaac7d..7098978 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -4411,15 +4411,7 @@ void netdev_printk(const char *level, const struct net_device *dev,
* Why 16. Because with 16 the only overlap we get on a hash of the
* low nibble of the protocol value is RARP/SNAP/X.25.
*
- * NOTE: That is no longer true with the addition of VLAN tags. Not
- * sure which should go first, but I bet it won't make much
- * difference if we are running VLANs. The good news is that
- * this protocol won't be in the list unless compiled in, so
- * the average user (w/out VLANs) will not be adversely affected.
- * --BLG
- *
* 0800 IP
- * 8100 802.1Q VLAN
* 0001 802.3
* 0002 AX.25
* 0004 802.2
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists