netdev - Re: [PATCH 16/31] nds32: VDSO support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABeXuvqvyeXYZMj05bfeKOgBK5i3mK6imsD2iNFfKES1kTjUng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:14:12 -0800
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
        Greentime <greentime@...estech.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/31] nds32: VDSO support

> Do applications call into the vdso directly and expect to get a timespec
> out? If they always go through the C library as an intermediate, then
> the glibc clock_gettime() could do the conversion.

It is recommended that applications do not call vdso symbols directly.
According to manpage:

"If you're trying to call the vDSO in your own application rather than
using the C library, you're most likely doing it wrong."

-Deepa