[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171108034911.16382-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:49:08 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, andrew@...n.ch, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: phy: sfp: Do not reject soldered down modules
The SFP module identification code in sfp_sm_mod_probe() will reject SFF
modules soldered down because they have an identified of 0x2, while the code
currently checks for 0x3 only (SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP), update that.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 5 +++--
include/linux/sfp.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index e381811e5f11..942288aa9cdb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -463,8 +463,9 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp)
vendor, part, rev, sn, date);
/* We only support SFP modules, not the legacy GBIC modules. */
- if (sfp->id.base.phys_id != SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP ||
- sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id != SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP) {
+ if ((sfp->id.base.phys_id != SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP &&
+ sfp->id.base.phys_id != SFP_PHYS_ID_SFF) ||
+ sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id != SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP) {
dev_err(sfp->dev, "module is not SFP - phys id 0x%02x 0x%02x\n",
sfp->id.base.phys_id, sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id);
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/linux/sfp.h b/include/linux/sfp.h
index 4a906f560817..ee65831fe2c5 100644
--- a/include/linux/sfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/sfp.h
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ enum {
SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE = 0x5e,
SFP_CC_EXT = 0x5f,
+ SFP_PHYS_ID_SFF = 0x02,
SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP = 0x03,
SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP = 0x04,
SFP_CONNECTOR_UNSPEC = 0x00,
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists