netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/4] RFC: net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171109153857.GA13277@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:38:57 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Antti Seppälä <a.seppala@...il.com>,
        Colin Leitner <colin.leitner@...glemail.com>,
        Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] RFC: net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver

> >>Unless switchdev could be expanded to support other functions beyond
> >>VLAN,
> >>like port rate control, ACL, HW NAT (no switchdev L3 offload doesn't fit
> >>this), etc.
> >
> >Switchdev allows offloading of TC. So port rate control would be
> >implemented via TC.
> 
> That's interesting. Are there any examples implemented?

Mellonex have a few for there TOR switches.

The SF2 has TC mirred implemented. I could also implement this for
Marvell without too much effort.  No DSA switch yet implements port
rate control via TC. But TC would be the correct interface to use.

> >By ACL do you mean filtering MAC addresses?
> 
> Not only. Usually ACL means defining action with rules matching MAC/IP
> address, physical or TCP/IP port, VID, Ethertype or even custom bytes.
> And actions could be drop, assign rate, change VID/priority, force L3
> offload or mirroring, redirect/copy to CPU port.

So this means mapping iptable rules to the switches TCAM. Pablo has
said he is working on this, but there has not been any code posted
yet.

> But the question how exactly it will be done?

The whole idea with switchdev is that your switch interfaces look like
a bunch of linux interfaces, and you configure them just as normal
Linux interface. You setup NAT as you would normally setup NAT. It
then gets pushed down to the hardware. You setup TC rules or ip table
rules on the interface, and they get pushed down to the hardware.

It is just Linux networking as normal. Think of the switch as an
accelerator for what Linux networking can already do.

      Andrew