netdev - Re: [vlan_device_event] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6ccf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:51:14 -0800
From:   Girish Moodalbail <girish.moodalbail@...cle.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [vlan_device_event] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
 at 6b6b6ccf

On 11/8/17 10:34 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>>> So looking over the trace the panic seems to be happening after a
>>> decnet interface is getting deleted. Is there any chance we could try
>>> compiling the kernel without decnet support to see if that is the
>>> source of these issues? I don't know if anyone on the Intel Wired Lan
>>> team is testing with that enabled so if we can eliminate that as a
>>> possible cause that would be useful.
>>
>>
>> Sure and thank you for the suggestion!
>>
>> It looks disabling DECNET still triggers the vlan_device_event BUG.
>> However when looking at the dmesgs, I find another warning just before
>> the vlan_device_event BUG. Not sure if it's related one or independent
>> now-fixed issue.
> 
> Those decnet symbols are probably noises.

Right. This is a 32-bit Kernel compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y (I am guessing 
that this has exposed some lock bug). Also, VLAN (8021q) is compiled into the 
kernel, so it registers a vlan_device_event() callback on boot. There may not be 
a VLAN device per-se.

Upon receiving NETDEV_DOWN event, we are calling

         vlan_vid_del(dev, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), 0);

which in turn calls call_rcu() to queue vlan_info_free_rcu() to be called at 
some point. This free function frees the array[] 
(vlan_info.vlan_grp.vn_devices_array).  My guess is that vlan_info_free_rcu() is 
being called first and then the array[] is being accessed in vlan_device_event().

The netifd daemon in OpenWRT is marking the interface down and that is why it is 
generating NETDEV_DOWN event. And it uses ioctl(SIOCSIFFLAGS, ~IFF_UP) on a 
AF_UNIX socket. This results in a call to dev_ifsioc() in the kernel with only 
rtnl_lock() held and it is not in RCU read critical section.

~Girish

> 
> How do you reproduce it? And what is your setup? Vlan device on
> top of your eth0 (e1000)?
>