netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: bgmac: Pad packets to a minimum size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 15:03:16 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: bgmac: Pad packets to a minimum size

On 11/09/2017 02:37 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:26:04PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> In preparation for enabling Broadcom tags with b53, pad packets to a
>> minimum size of 64 bytes (sans FCS) in order for the Broadcom switch to
>> accept ingressing frames. Without this, we would typically be able to
>> DHCP, but not resolve with ARP because packets are too small and get
>> rejected by the switch.
> 
> Hi Florian
> 
> Is the MAC sending runt packets in its default configuration? Is this
> a general issue, and not just an issue when there is a switch directly
> attached?

The MAC is sending 64 bytes (with FCS) padded packets by default, but
this apparently gets mis-calculated when Broadcom tags are enabled, such
that we need to pad before to avoid that.
-- 
Florian