netdev - Re: [Patch net 05/13] cls_cgroup: use tcf_exts_get_net() before call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVgdyRDYwGUuRUDYxhkRTZWZWG9H51e0-ccw0Vawex-PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 15:52:41 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lucas Bates <lucasb@...atatu.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [Patch net 05/13] cls_cgroup: use tcf_exts_get_net() before call_rcu()

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com> wrote:
> Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> writes:
>> @@ -124,8 +130,10 @@ static int cls_cgroup_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>>               goto errout;
>>
>>       rcu_assign_pointer(tp->root, new);
>> -     if (head)
>> +     if (head) {
>> +             tcf_exts_get_net(&head->exts);
>>               call_rcu(&head->rcu, cls_cgroup_destroy_rcu);
>
> In this case why do you not need to care about success/failure of
> tcf_exts_get_net() ?

The answer is right in the changelog you omitted... Quoted below:

"Note, on ->destroy() path we have to respect the return value
of tcf_exts_get_net(), on other paths it should always return
true, so we don't need to care."