netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: qcom/emac: fix the error of tpd buff address valid bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29f7b4e7-11b6-4378-d75f-d57a8802a19f@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:08:14 -0600
From:   Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:     "Wang, Dongsheng" <wdsch86@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qcom/emac: fix the error of tpd buff address valid
 bit

On 11/10/2017 07:24 AM, Wang, Dongsheng wrote:
>>
> On QDF2400, EMAC TPD buff address size is [45:0]. buff address_l [31:0], 
> buff address_h [31:18].
> The address_h should change from [30:18] to [31:18]. So TPD buff address 
> should has 46bits.

Bit 31 of the Word 3 in the TPD is the Timestamp_save.  BUFFER_ADDR_H is 
[30:18], not [31:18].

I'm curious to know where you get your information.  For one thing, if 
you're a Qualcomm employee, you should be using your codeaurora.org 
email address.  You would know that if you took LOST training.

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.