netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2][v5] Add the ability to do BPF directed error injection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:20:46 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Cc:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][v5] Add the ability to do BPF directed error
 injection

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:43:25AM +0900, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 11/8/17 5:28 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes in his
> > tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
> > somebody on the tracing side.
> > 
> > v4->v5:
> > - disallow kprobe_override programs from being put in the prog map array so we
> >   don't tail call into something we didn't check.  This allows us to make the
> >   normal path still fast without a bunch of percpu operations.
> 
> looks great to me.
> Peter,
> could you please review x86 bits?

I did not in fact get the patch... But after digging it out of LKML I
don't immediately see something broken, but this is not stuff I
typically know well.